Two-sided discovery design simulation — 3 October 2026
Mode: built-in imagegen, three independent calls. Backend model not inferred.
References: prior Eiko catalogue A, prior goal-led B, original Eiko mascot. Brand and layout references only.
No real wallet or live quote is represented. Hypothetical numbers are recorded in fixtures.json.

A · Two routes per asset
Use case: ui-mockup. High-fidelity shippable-looking Eiko website concept, not a wireframe or a promotional poster. Create a large desktop composition beside one reflowed phone composition in a landscape board. No device hardware. User selected the asset-catalogue direction in reference 1, but wants two equally discoverable audiences: vault depositors who earn trading fees, AND buyers of actual options. 'Buy tokens lower' is a depositor goal; it is NOT the options-buying route. Reference 1 is the approved asset catalogue for identity/breadth; reference 2 is the earlier goal-first proposal for role clarity only; reference 3 is Eiko's small purple kimono robot, use at most once per viewport. Preserve white/lavender surfaces, navy type, violet actions, warm modern sans-serif.
Common navigation: 'Explore', 'My positions', 'How it works', optional 'Connect wallet'. Browsing needs no wallet. Main headline 'Your token. Your next move.' Subtitle 'Earn trading fees or buy options.' Keep the hero short so real choices dominate. Catalogue contains only VIRTUAL, TIBBIR, ROBO, OPG. Small friendly asset emblems; no invented supported chains, APY, TVL, testimonials or glowing profit charts.
THIS IS A LAYOUT SIMULATION. Put 'DESIGN STUDY · ILLUSTRATIVE FIGURES' visibly in the outer board heading. Every numeric response module carries a small 'Illustrative example' label. No 'live quote' or real-history claim. Figures below are deliberately hypothetical and must be copied exactly; never add different figures.
Selected example asset: TIBBIR. Distinct role content:
EARN FEES: prompt 'Have a buy or sell price?' with 'Sell higher' / 'Buy lower'. In selected Sell higher example: 'Amount: 1,000 TIBBIR', 'Target: $0.26'. Numeric answer is explicitly a PAST example, never a forecast: 'Example past outcome', headline '+13 USDC vs limit order', supporting 'Vault 273 USDC · Limit order 260 USDC'. CTA 'See past outcomes'. This is a mocked historical example, not real TIBBIR data. Show no promised payment at the target.
BUY OPTIONS: prompt 'Have a market view?' with 'Price up' / 'Price down'. In selected Price up example: 'Budget: 100 USDC', 'Expiry: 10 Oct'. Hypothetical purchase summary: '5,000 TIBBIR calls', 'Strike $0.26', 'Total cost 100 USDC'. CTA 'Review options'. Cue 'No vault deposit needed'. Optional scenario comparison must say 'At expiry' and 'Profit after purchase cost': price $0.30 gives payout 200 USDC and profit +100 USDC; price $0.24 gives payout 0 USDC and profit −100 USDC. Gains and losses same visual weight. No claimed probabilities, guarantee, annualization or '100 USDC profit' mislabelled as 200.
Keep observed or past-example outcomes visually distinct from hypothetical future price scenarios. No connection arrow from vault deposit to buying options. Do not imply buyers must own TIBBIR, own vault shares or deposit first. These are separate routes. Show all principal choices on the phone, use large touch controls and trim copy. A small 'Explore' button alone is insufficient: preserve the actual Earn fees / Buy options distinction.
LAYOUT HYPOTHESIS A: Retain the tangible four-asset catalogue. Each asset card has TWO same-sized explicit actions 'Earn fees' and 'Buy options' (equal emphasis, not a buyer text link hidden in the footer). VIRTUAL, ROBO, OPG compact; TIBBIR is selected, opening a clean expanded row beneath its card. That expansion shows a concise buyer summary and two equally legible small gain/loss outcome rows from the supplied example, while the card has a small separate 'Example past outcome +13 USDC vs limit order' under Earn fees, NOT under Buy options. Do not cram four full calculators into the grid. Phone: compact asset list, selected TIBBIR card showing BOTH actions, followed by its buyer preview. Keep another asset visible to show breadth. Goal: same asset, two distinct doors, immediate concrete benefit.

B · Choose a side, then browse
Use case: ui-mockup. High-fidelity shippable-looking Eiko website concept, not a wireframe or a promotional poster. Create a large desktop composition beside one reflowed phone composition in a landscape board. No device hardware. User selected the asset-catalogue direction in reference 1, but wants two equally discoverable audiences: vault depositors who earn trading fees, AND buyers of actual options. 'Buy tokens lower' is a depositor goal; it is NOT the options-buying route. Reference 1 is the approved asset catalogue for identity/breadth; reference 2 is the earlier goal-first proposal for role clarity only; reference 3 is Eiko's small purple kimono robot, use at most once per viewport. Preserve white/lavender surfaces, navy type, violet actions, warm modern sans-serif.
Common navigation: 'Explore', 'My positions', 'How it works', optional 'Connect wallet'. Browsing needs no wallet. Main headline 'Your token. Your next move.' Subtitle 'Earn trading fees or buy options.' Keep the hero short so real choices dominate. Catalogue contains only VIRTUAL, TIBBIR, ROBO, OPG. Small friendly asset emblems; no invented supported chains, APY, TVL, testimonials or glowing profit charts.
THIS IS A LAYOUT SIMULATION. Put 'DESIGN STUDY · ILLUSTRATIVE FIGURES' visibly in the outer board heading. Every numeric response module carries a small 'Illustrative example' label. No 'live quote' or real-history claim. Figures below are deliberately hypothetical and must be copied exactly; never add different figures.
Selected example asset: TIBBIR. Distinct role content:
EARN FEES: prompt 'Have a buy or sell price?' with 'Sell higher' / 'Buy lower'. In selected Sell higher example: 'Amount: 1,000 TIBBIR', 'Target: $0.26'. Numeric answer is explicitly a PAST example, never a forecast: 'Example past outcome', headline '+13 USDC vs limit order', supporting 'Vault 273 USDC · Limit order 260 USDC'. CTA 'See past outcomes'. This is a mocked historical example, not real TIBBIR data. Show no promised payment at the target.
BUY OPTIONS: prompt 'Have a market view?' with 'Price up' / 'Price down'. In selected Price up example: 'Budget: 100 USDC', 'Expiry: 10 Oct'. Hypothetical purchase summary: '5,000 TIBBIR calls', 'Strike $0.26', 'Total cost 100 USDC'. CTA 'Review options'. Cue 'No vault deposit needed'. Optional scenario comparison must say 'At expiry' and 'Profit after purchase cost': price $0.30 gives payout 200 USDC and profit +100 USDC; price $0.24 gives payout 0 USDC and profit −100 USDC. Gains and losses same visual weight. No claimed probabilities, guarantee, annualization or '100 USDC profit' mislabelled as 200.
Keep observed or past-example outcomes visually distinct from hypothetical future price scenarios. No connection arrow from vault deposit to buying options. Do not imply buyers must own TIBBIR, own vault shares or deposit first. These are separate routes. Show all principal choices on the phone, use large touch controls and trim copy. A small 'Explore' button alone is insufficient: preserve the actual Earn fees / Buy options distinction.
LAYOUT HYPOTHESIS B: A page-wide large segmented switch 'Earn fees' / 'Buy options' immediately beneath the short hero, Buy options visibly selected. It changes the entire catalogue's meaning; do NOT mix depositor return figures into the active buyer grid. Four asset cards visible, each with a 'See options' action; selected TIBBIR shows the supplied total cost and 5,000-call quantity. Above the cards is a compact budget 100 USDC / expiry 10 Oct / Price up-Price down filter strip. Beneath selected card, a small two-outcome 'At expiry' panel contrasts +100 and −100 USDC profit after cost. In the board's small supporting inset, show ONLY the Earn fees mode's TIBBIR card using the +13 USDC past example, clearly labelled 'Alternate Earn fees view' outside it. The phone mainly shows active Buy options mode but the Earn fees switch remains prominent at top. Goal: no repeated dual buttons on every card; every displayed metric belongs to the selected role.

C · Build a plan for one asset
Use case: ui-mockup. High-fidelity shippable-looking Eiko website concept, not a wireframe or a promotional poster. Create a large desktop composition beside one reflowed phone composition in a landscape board. No device hardware. User selected the asset-catalogue direction in reference 1, but wants two equally discoverable audiences: vault depositors who earn trading fees, AND buyers of actual options. 'Buy tokens lower' is a depositor goal; it is NOT the options-buying route. Reference 1 is the approved asset catalogue for identity/breadth; reference 2 is the earlier goal-first proposal for role clarity only; reference 3 is Eiko's small purple kimono robot, use at most once per viewport. Preserve white/lavender surfaces, navy type, violet actions, warm modern sans-serif.
Common navigation: 'Explore', 'My positions', 'How it works', optional 'Connect wallet'. Browsing needs no wallet. Main headline 'Your token. Your next move.' Subtitle 'Earn trading fees or buy options.' Keep the hero short so real choices dominate. Catalogue contains only VIRTUAL, TIBBIR, ROBO, OPG. Small friendly asset emblems; no invented supported chains, APY, TVL, testimonials or glowing profit charts.
THIS IS A LAYOUT SIMULATION. Put 'DESIGN STUDY · ILLUSTRATIVE FIGURES' visibly in the outer board heading. Every numeric response module carries a small 'Illustrative example' label. No 'live quote' or real-history claim. Figures below are deliberately hypothetical and must be copied exactly; never add different figures.
Selected example asset: TIBBIR. Distinct role content:
EARN FEES: prompt 'Have a buy or sell price?' with 'Sell higher' / 'Buy lower'. In selected Sell higher example: 'Amount: 1,000 TIBBIR', 'Target: $0.26'. Numeric answer is explicitly a PAST example, never a forecast: 'Example past outcome', headline '+13 USDC vs limit order', supporting 'Vault 273 USDC · Limit order 260 USDC'. CTA 'See past outcomes'. This is a mocked historical example, not real TIBBIR data. Show no promised payment at the target.
BUY OPTIONS: prompt 'Have a market view?' with 'Price up' / 'Price down'. In selected Price up example: 'Budget: 100 USDC', 'Expiry: 10 Oct'. Hypothetical purchase summary: '5,000 TIBBIR calls', 'Strike $0.26', 'Total cost 100 USDC'. CTA 'Review options'. Cue 'No vault deposit needed'. Optional scenario comparison must say 'At expiry' and 'Profit after purchase cost': price $0.30 gives payout 200 USDC and profit +100 USDC; price $0.24 gives payout 0 USDC and profit −100 USDC. Gains and losses same visual weight. No claimed probabilities, guarantee, annualization or '100 USDC profit' mislabelled as 200.
Keep observed or past-example outcomes visually distinct from hypothetical future price scenarios. No connection arrow from vault deposit to buying options. Do not imply buyers must own TIBBIR, own vault shares or deposit first. These are separate routes. Show all principal choices on the phone, use large touch controls and trim copy. A small 'Explore' button alone is insufficient: preserve the actual Earn fees / Buy options distinction.
LAYOUT HYPOTHESIS C: Short hero, then a beautiful compact horizontal asset selector VIRTUAL / TIBBIR / ROBO / OPG with TIBBIR selected. Below it two equal-height working plan panels side by side. LEFT 'Earn fees' has Have a buy or sell price?, amount and target inputs, the +13 USDC Example past outcome, with its 273-versus-260 comparison and See past outcomes action. RIGHT 'Buy options' has Have a market view?, Price up/down choice, budget and expiry inputs, its 5,000-call / $0.26 / 100-USDC purchase summary and Review options. Below the right summary add very compact positive and negative At-expiry rows, each showing net profit after cost. Use minimal form chrome, restrained illustrations and enough white space; no chat bubbles or wizard. Phone: asset selector wraps in a tidy 2x2; two equal compact plan choices are visible, selected Buy options expands while Earn fees remains a labelled collapsed card with its historical-example headline. Goal: user sees their own intent and the corresponding monetary answer without confusing past return and future option scenario.